Sign In . Don't have a World Wisdom ID? Sign Up
Interview with Frithjof Schuon - on Art
Who was Charles Eastman (Ohiyesa)?
What is "Christian Spirit"?
William C. Chittick explores "The Sufi Doctrine of Rumi"
Insights into the early Christian Desert Fathers and Mothers
Science and the Myth of Progress
Where to look to "see God Everywhere"?
A Definition of the Perennial Philosophy
Every Branch In Me: Who are we as "human" beings?
Exploring "Timeless in Time" - a biography of Sri Ramana Maharshi
  Science and the Myth of Progress Back to the List of Slideshows
slide 12 of 16

Huston Smith defines Scientism for us and delineates the difference between it and Science:
Only four letters, “tism,” separate scientism from science, but that small slip twixt the cup and the lip is the cause of all our current problems relating to worldview and the human spirit. Science is on balance good, whereas nothing good can be said for scientism.

Everything depends on definitions here, for this chapter will fall apart if the distinction between science and scientism is allowed to slip from view. To get those definitions right requires cutting through the swarm of thoughts, images, sentiments, and vested interests that circle the word science today to arrive at the only definition of the word that I take to be incontrovertible—namely, that science is what has changed our world. Accompanied by technology (its spin off), modern science is what divides modern from traditional societies and civilizations. Its content is the body of facts about the natural world that the scientific method has brought to light, the crux of that method being the controlled experiment with its capacity to winnow true from false hypotheses about the empirical world.

Scientism adds to science two corollaries: first, that the scientific method is, if not the only reliable method of getting at truth, then at least the most reliable method; and second, that the things science deals with—material entities—are the most fundamental things that exist. These two corollaries are seldom voiced, for once they are brought to attention it is not difficult to see that they are arbitrary. Unsupported by facts, they are at best philosophical assumptions and at worst merely opinions.
Huston Smith alerts us to the fact that scientism, far from encouraging healthy debate, uses its influence in the scientific institutions to ensure that dissenting voices are not heard. This leaves many people wondering what then has become of the objectivity that is supposed to be the cornerstone of all true science.
Huston Smith
Back to the List of Slideshows

Home | Books | DVDs | Authors | eProducts | Members | Slideshows | Library | Image-Gallery | Links | About Us

Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2008