Sign In . Don't have a World Wisdom ID? Sign Up

   Limit Search to: Advanced Search
The Sermon of All Creation: Christians on Nature
William C. Chittick explores "The Sufi Doctrine of Rumi"
Martin Lings: Video Clips on his Early Spiritual Influences
The Perennial Philosophy Series
A Definition of the Perennial Philosophy
What bridges exist between Christianity and Islam?
Interview with Frithjof Schuon - on Spirituality
Paul Goble's World: Native Americans' relationship to all created beings
Interview with Frithjof Schuon - on Art
The Fullness of God: Frithjof Schuon on Christianity
  Frithjof Schuon on Christianity Back to the List of Slideshows
The Trinity,
from a French medieval illumination
slide 5 of 17

The Christian understanding of the Incarnation is itself based on the Trinity. Schuon’s teachings on this subject are complex and it is impossible to survey them adequately here. From one perspective, the hypostases of the Trinity are Relative:
God is the Absolute; He is the single Essence, whereas the three Persons are the first Relativities…they actualize the indivisible characteristics of the Essence. (from “Evidence and Mystery”, p. 117)
But from another perspective, the Father is Absolute and the Son and Spirit Relative:
The Father is Beyond-Being, the Son is Being, and the Spirit is Beatitude and Manifestation.…(from “Some Observations”, p. 39)
From a certain perspective, they are Absolute:
The Persons are eminently present in pure Atma; otherwise they could not actualize themselves within Maya. In this sense the hypostatic Persons are above Relativity; they are intrinsic aspects of the Absolute.… (from “Appendix: A Sampling of Letters and Other Unpublished Materials”, p. 168)
Hence the ambiguity of the relationship of the Father to the Son: the Son is both equal and subordinate, depending on perspective:
The Gospels show…that the Son is at once subordinate and equal to the Father, and it is precisely this antinomy that opens up for us in an indicative manner the mystery of Relativity in divinis. (from “Evidence and Mystery”, p. 122)

The hypostases are not “relative” inasmuch as they are “contained” in the Essence…they are relative inasmuch as they “emanate” from Him; if they were not “contained” in Him, they could not “emanate”.…At the level of essentiality…they coincide with the Absolute purely and simply. (from “Appendix: A Sampling of Letters and Other Unpublished Materials”, p. 176)
At the highest plane of understanding the Trinity is multiplicity in divinis—multiplicity that is not other than the Absolute unity from which nothing is absent. The Absolute transcends the distinction between simplex and complex; it is neither and both. The doctrine of the Trinity is esoteric and metaphysical:
Any normal man can conceive of the divine Unity to some extent…[but] the Trinity can be understood only by those who…are able…to move…in the metaphysical dimension.… (from “The Particular Nature and Universality of the Christian Tradition”, p. 13)
Schuon approaches the issue of the Trinity from several perspectives, but even this does not exhaust this mystery, as he remarks,
We are here at the limit of what can be expressed; it is no one’s fault if…there remain questions without an answer, and perhaps without any possible answer, at least at the dialectical level.…The science of the heart is not subject to discussion. (from “Appendix: A Sampling of Letters and Other Unpublished Materials”, p. 176)
Back to the List of Slideshows

Home | Books | DVDs | Authors | eProducts | Members | Slideshows | Library | Image-Gallery | Links | About Us | Sitemap

Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2008